Camille Paglias Rape and the Modern Sex War Essay

Camille Paglias Rape and the Modern Sex War Camille Paglia writes the article, Rape and the Modern Sex War, which is about young women being vulnerable in today’s society against rape and how feminism has mistakenly led women to believe that they aren’t in any danger. Paglia states her opinion to women because she believes â€Å"that women are vulnerable and should be aware of the pervasiveness of rape† (83) all the time. Rape has been around for hundreds of years and the effects it has on women are life long terrifying memories. Paglia speaks to women saying that they should be ready for these situations and not be with a group of guys alone, always be with other girlfriends, and learn to take feminism out of the picture and realize†¦show more content†¦Running to a certain authority is not the definition of a strong woman, says Paglia referring to her Italian philosophy that existence brings about confrontation (84). She wants women to stand up for themselves and when a man makes a rude remark a bout a women’s sexuality they should deal with it then and there. Paglia uses an example from the movie Where the Boys Are when talking about feminism because the movie takes place in 1960 and is about women anticipating and defending themselves against horny men. It’s victim is lured into a room full of guys not seeing what is about to happen and says that actions are often not perceived correctly and this is where the different sexualities are noticed (84). This point can be argued because the media blows things out of proportion and this evidence isn’t really evidence because it 3 lacks reality and is an opinion of Paglia’s. Paglia’s final assumption in her essay is geared toward both sexes and how we must prevent rape as a society. Men and women must come to certain identities, which are somewhat similar but are easily distinguished according to Paglia in my point of view. When a man has sex with a girl it is said that he is entering manhood. W hen a woman menstruates she is becoming a â€Å"real woman† and she wants women to know

Dali Art Free Essays

Fruit Dish on a Beach This painting is hanging above my bed, I see it on a daily basis and always can think of something new when I look at it. This is Salvador Dalais abstract art in which he does best. Dali is a well-known Spaniard surrealist. We will write a custom essay sample on Dali Art or any similar topic only for you Order Now The name of the painting is The Apparition of Face and Fruit Dish on a Beach. The artwork is so odd causing the explanation to be hard. Illusionist’s Surrealism is one form of art that is portrayed very well in dalais artwork. The Big picture looking at it from afar you will see a dog, a table, wine glass, or the human face. If you look at the fine detail you will find lots of interesting and abstract additions to this art. The upper center part in the background you will see two hilltops one of them covered in grass and the other rocky landscape. The right hand corner there is another grassy hill terrain right above the dogs head. Appears to be clear skies on the left with a stormy approach from the right. Like the water coming to feed the dry spot on the sandy and desert like terrain. I really think it is interesting as you look at the eye of the dog it acts as a peephole and you can see the scenic background through it. Underneath the dogs snout you will see a desert like environment with several trees and it includes a black and white horse playing. There is a hidden face as well, which I find very out of place or abstract. It looks like pears on the edge of the dogs body with the horizon landscape behind. The rear hip of the dog looks almost like a clipping from â€Å"A starry night† almost. It is like a sunset or sunrise scene with what looks to be like waves. If go right to towards the center it looks like a scene from hell with fire, bones, skeletons, vase, a broken vase and woven basket. The vase is the left eye in the face with the right eye being a dead baby or could be sleeping. He has arranged things in this painting so uniquely. The center of the painting where it appears to be shaped like a wine glass almost creates a tunnel or funnel for the bodies on the right side falling down into darkness. The dog collar seems as a bridge over the river coming down into the goblet with pears into. It almost is like eggs going over to this dungeon type room. It has a man standing there without a face drying him off as if he Just finished showering. On the other side of the wall where the man is standing there sitting looks as if he was writing. He is wearing a Arabic type covering over his head. Something you would see someone wearing in a desert. In the dungeon type room in the paintings two guys as skeletons which one looks like a pirate. There is a child who is reaching for something or maybe the loss of the one who looks to be a skeleton. Below that you will see what seems like a blotched over a straight line or end of the table. There is a broken rope hanging over the edge with a cloth as well Just sitting there as well as couple egg shaped objects scattered through out the table. There is a small goblet with pears, maybe where he came up with the fruit dish on the beach part of the name. This is the best-detailed description I can give. This painting always makes me think and wonder what is his overall theory what brought every part of it together. I think that he choose this though to represent the two sides of a sunny day or a stormy one. The eve of life and death with his beloved dog as well. I am convinced that this twisted painting can be interpreted into the dream life that he had imagined for America. It has each odd piece of the artwork as multiple purposes or visions. For example the odd vase in the middle of the picture ends up being the eye of the face, which is evolved from the other parts. The meaning would be far few and between. Artist’s thoughts may never be revealed but in my opinion I have come to the conclusion that he was so confused as to what the American dream was or what it might entail. He obviously loves dogs. Enjoys the beach with the waves. Pears are most likely one of his favorite fruits. He shows the beauty of the women’s smile. This picture also shows the afterlife or imaging death at the end of the dream. I was lead to believe that by all the bones and dark parts of the picture. It has a gloomy and dark side to it. With the table edge and rope hanging off brings a depressing side to it. Overall I love this artwork and I don’t really see the dark side of it as a strong influence. I almost see past it because of the white space it really overtakes the dark I think. This painting is something that I wouldn’t imagine someone today coming up with anything like it. Inspired by Dali or not this is one very unique piece of work. The formal elements as I understand the space is one of the best used. The open white space with the tablecloth and the face is very well distinguishable appearing lust as blank space. The composition is really out of whack until you more understand or observe all of the parts involved. The color is very pastel and light. Lines or defined with the horizon and the table edge. I really enjoy all the artwork Dali has put together. How to cite Dali Art, Papers

Global Reasoning and Global Argument

Question: Discuss about the Global Reasoning and Global Argument. Answer: Introduction: The text deals with the global warming conference that came to be known as the 21st Conference of the Parties (COP21). The concerned parties belong to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change which is based in Bonn, Germany. The meeting of COP occurs annually to implement the decisions reached at in the Conference and to deal with the climatic issues ("UN Climate Change Conference Paris 2015", 2016). The resolutions that the representatives of the different nations have taken in the Conference were mocked at. The chief reason behind such meetings is considered to benefit the political leaders from around the world. The concept of global warming has been exaggerated since the scientists have ensured that the threat to the earth with regards to global warming has minimized over the decade (as per the text). The frenzy of climatic change has been spread by the communists to wipe out capitalism. Diagram of the argument: The Paris conference for climate change was unsuccessful. The developing nations are demanding for more money from the developed nations. The developing nations think that they can control global warming. The UN thinks that global warming is responsible for many things. It is actually a ploy to impose taxation on common people. The global warming is a deceit just like the Y2K bug. Global warming has not posed a threat to the earth for the past 18 years. The concept of climate change is just the conspiracy of the communists. Only the politicians and not the scientists believe in global warming. Proposals for countering climate change will cause economic collapse. Strengths and Weaknesses of the arguments: The very first line itself has brought home the line of attack regarding the global warming conference that took place in Paris. The developing nations, China and India, have claimed that they require adequate amount of money from the developed nations like US and UK to control the carbon footprint generated in their countries. It was claimed that China and India are the massive producers of carbon footprint whereas no mention is made of US which was a developed nation and also contributed generation of 40 percent of carbon emissions ("US and China to sign Paris climate deal in April", 2016). Additionally, the developed nations were obliged to provide funds to the developing nations to help them adjust to the adverse effects of global warming (Gosden, 2015). The impacts of the global warming on weather, poverty level, drought and flood, violence, prostitution and alcoholism were dealt with. There is enough evidence which proves that global warming has lead to melting of glaciers and rise in ocean level ("Impacts of global warming and climate change", 2016). As per the research paper by Hirabayashi et al. (2013), the warm climate leads to increase in floods on a global scale. The widespread drought can also occur as a result of either decrease in precipitation or increase in evaporation (Dai, 2013). Investigations also prove that climatic changes have led to natural disasters and which have caused the destruction of private possessions and livelihoods (Fay et al., 2015). The relationship between climate change and intercommunal violence is underway though there is an indication towards a limited connection. It was also mentioned that the so called concern for global warming is actually a means of imposing taxation on common people. However, the claim was not substantiated through adequate proofs of such taxes. The writing also seemed to be obsessed with communism without actually proving his claims. The Y2K problem as propounded by Al Gore which states that in the year 2000, the computers will face a date issue which will affect all the computers was linked with the climate change ("Y2K and Al Gore", 2016). However, this incident has been controversial as it attracted a lot of criticisms from leaders across the world. The connection between the two incidents is incorrect since the impact of the global warming can be felt all around the globe and can be addressed only with the help of all the nations unlike the computer glitch which can be re-engineered. The threat to the eco system owing to the rising levels of greenhouse gases is now a well established fact (Grimm et al., 2013). On this way the investigations of several scientists of various nationalities were ignored but the issue was also subsequently connected with communism. The issue was connected with the concept of taxation which was believed to be the idea of communists (2.1). Through repeated criticism against communism, the preference was shown for a particular ideology but failed to prove his point. The opinion of the physicist Robert Laughlin in support of his argument was mentioned ("The American Scholar: What the Earth Knows - Robert B. Laughlin", 2016). However, as mentioned in Premise 2, the opposite views of Laughlin have established that the impact of global warning can be reduced through prudent steps taken by every country. The Americans do not show any concern for the global warming. This fact was uttered in a way that shows concurrence with their view (as per the text). It is believed that the politicians are creating this fad and their view is unsupported by scientists. According to the text, the changes would cause a collapse in the world economy. Figures were also mentioned who has not only spoken of the steps that should be taken to lower the impact of global warming, but she has also spoken of the destruction of capitalism (Figures, 2014). The disregard was shown for the argument presented by Figures saying that capitalism is the force that has actually helped in the alleviation of poverty though the regular perception says that capitalism is the reason behind poverty in the first place (Figures, 2014). The above discussion is clearly indicating that the second and the third premises stated above are more linked with the argument made in the global warming conference than the first premise. The first premise is more linked with the reasons for which the global warming conference was unsuccessful. However, it cannot be said that the first premise is not linked with the argument. It has mentioned about the role played by the developing countries like, China and India, which was also mentioned in the conference. On the other side, in the second and third premises the main discussion is related to the issues of global warming. In these two premises the main focus has been made on the global warming and its reasons as well as effects, which were the main discussion in the global warming conference. Analysis of the rhetoric: The language was used in such a way that brings out criticism of the global warming conference at Paris. In the very first line it is described the conference as having turned to custard which is an expression that is mostly used in New Zealand (as per the text). Light hearted, mocking tone has been used to prove the point that the concerns regarding global warming are baseless. The conclusion was reached at that the communists are spreading this information to wipe out capitalism from the world. The second paragraph talked in detail about the so called impacts of the global warning in different domains. The remarks are included along with each point to show contempt for the conference. The force of the comments is undeniable through his usage of strong sentences. In the course of the discussion, the data is collected from the satellite and also a scientist to prove that the global warming is an invention of the politicians. In an attempt to show disdain for the Australian government , Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull was targeted at by saying that he had moral vanity and then adds funnily that he also had a warm overcoat (as per the text). This is an excellent example of sarcasm since the Minister has attended a meeting for global warming whereas he was seen sporting a warm coat! New words like greenies and greenmail were made up to mock at the conventional phrase go green that is used to denote the slogan for conservationists. In the second half of the piece of writing, the tone undergoes a sudden transformation as figures and facts are quoted to show that the steps taken by the nations in the conference are actually misleading. The participant nations are called eco freaks and the preference for the ideology of capitalism has been shown as having helped in the elevation of the poor as opposed to communism though the public opinion has been otherwise. It is forcefully claimed that Australia should not support the nations in their campaign for a greener earth (a s per the text). Instead the Prime Minister is suggested to return home to Australia and not waste any more money that is paid by the Australians. In short, the first and the last line of the piece is enough to show the overall tone of the writing. Conclusion: The strong language was used to showcase the disapproval of the global warming issues that have caused serious concern among the nations. Various parts of the issues were put forward in the conference and then arguments are shown against those issues. The facts, however, are put forward which can be refuted in various ways. However, it is notable that the writing has been successful in putting the views across to the reader. In the first half of the text, the writing has been casual in the arguments presented and it reflected a jovial tone. As the writing proceeded, the tone also changed to a serious note and the facts and figures replaced the coined up terms. Finally, the text ended with a potent sentence saying that the Australia should not be a part of this world wide frenzy for global warming and climate change. References: Arto, I., Dietzenbacher, E. (2014). Drivers of the growth in global greenhouse gas emissions.Environmental science technology,48(10), 5388-5394. Climate Change: Developing Countries Control theThermostat. (2016). Ncpa.org. Retrieved 21 September 2016, from https://www.ncpa.org/pub/ba694 Dai, A. (2013). Increasing drought under global warming in observations and models.Nature Climate Change,3(1), 52-58. Fay, M., Hallegatte, S., Bangalore, M., Kane, T., Rozenberg, J., Vogt-Schilb, A., ... Treguer, D. (2015).Shock Waves: Managing the impacts of climate change on Poverty. World Bank Publications. Figueres, C. (2014). Climate Change: Building the Will for Action.St. Pauls Institute, St. Pauls Cathedral, London. Gleditsch, N. P. (2012). Whither the weather? Climate change and conflict.Journal of Peace Research,49(1), 3-9. Gosden, E. (2015). Funding row 'threatens Paris climate deal', India and China warn. Telegraph.co.uk. Retrieved 21 September 2016, from https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/earth/paris-climate-change-conference/12030257/Funding-row-threatens-Paris-climate-deal-India-and-China-warn.html Grimm, N. B., Chapin, F. S., Bierwagen, B., Gonzalez, P., Groffman, P. M., Luo, Y., ... Schimel, J. (2013). The impacts of climate change on ecosystem structure and function.Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment,11(9), 474-482. Hirabayashi, Y., Mahendran, R., Koirala, S., Konoshima, L., Yamazaki, D., Watanabe, S., ... Kanae, S. (2013). Global flood risk under climate change.Nature Climate Change,3(9), 816-821. Impacts of global warming and climate change. (2016). Wwf.org.au. Retrieved 21 September 2016,from https://www.wwf.org.au/our_work/people_and_the_environment/global_warming_and_climate_change/impacts/ The American Scholar: What the Earth Knows - Robert B. Laughlin. (2016). Theamericanscholar.org. Retrieved 21 September 2016, from https://theamericanscholar.org/what-the-earth-knows/ UN Climate Change Conference Paris 2015. (2016). United Nations Sustainable Development. Retrieved 20 September 2016, from https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/cop21/#About US and China to sign Paris climate deal in April. (2016). the Guardian. Retrieved 21 September 2016, from https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2016/apr/01/us-and-china-to-sign-paris-climate-deal-in-april Y2K and Al Gore. (2016). Leaderu.com. Retrieved 21 September 2016, from https://www.leaderu.com/orgs/probe/docs/c-y2kgore.html.